<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music royalties are not the answer in the digital age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/</link>
	<description>Searching for beauty in the dissonance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:45:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unity Behind Diversity &#187; ASCAP Bill of Wrongs &#187; Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity Behind Diversity &#187; ASCAP Bill of Wrongs &#187; Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>[...] communication, the idea of using copyright to restrict content gets weird in a hurry. Royalties are not the answer for the digital age. 9. We have the right to decline participation in business models that require [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] communication, the idea of using copyright to restrict content gets weird in a hurry. Royalties are not the answer for the digital age. 9. We have the right to decline participation in business models that require [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confusing royalties and salaries &#187; Unity Behind Diversity &#187; Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>Confusing royalties and salaries &#187; Unity Behind Diversity &#187; Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s the way in which he confuses royalties and salaries that&#8217;s problematic. Royalties aren&#8217;t always the answer, and though it may be convenient, it&#8217;s inaccurate to make an argument about paying people for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s the way in which he confuses royalties and salaries that&#8217;s problematic. Royalties aren&#8217;t always the answer, and though it may be convenient, it&#8217;s inaccurate to make an argument about paying people for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ßℓªï§£: Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s wrong with a music tax</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>ßℓªï§£: Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s wrong with a music tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/03/28/music-royalties-are-not-the-answer-in-the-digital-age/#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>[...] Royalties were not designed for the digital age. The proposal suggests what essentially would amount to a music tax. There is no way to opt-out and it applies to everyone with an internet connection. Since when are royalties taxes? Since when do royalties apply to everyone? Royalties were meant to regulate a few large distributors and broadcasters. In the digital age, everyone can be a distributor or broadcaster. It just doesn&#8217;t work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Royalties were not designed for the digital age. The proposal suggests what essentially would amount to a music tax. There is no way to opt-out and it applies to everyone with an internet connection. Since when are royalties taxes? Since when do royalties apply to everyone? Royalties were meant to regulate a few large distributors and broadcasters. In the digital age, everyone can be a distributor or broadcaster. It just doesn&#8217;t work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

