<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Music Doesn&#8217;t Mean Devalued Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blaise.ca/blog/2009/11/06/free-music-doesnt-mean-devalued-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2009/11/06/free-music-doesnt-mean-devalued-music/</link>
	<description>Searching for beauty in the dissonance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:05:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Modica</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2009/11/06/free-music-doesnt-mean-devalued-music/comment-page-1/#comment-24578</link>
		<dc:creator>Modica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/?p=1025#comment-24578</guid>
		<description>Nice idea! keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea! keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2009/11/06/free-music-doesnt-mean-devalued-music/comment-page-1/#comment-22557</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/?p=1025#comment-22557</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. That&#039;s an interesting thought, about the perception of value in the demand side being affected by free. I&#039;m not sure I agree entirely, but I can see that in some cases, if you don&#039;t present it well, it could come across as making music seem &quot;cheap&quot; or unimportant. I&#039;d argue the answer is to focus on the positives of access, engaging with fans, and making sure there are other offerings available to show that you&#039;re serious about business (and that the stuff takes money to make!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. That&#8217;s an interesting thought, about the perception of value in the demand side being affected by free. I&#8217;m not sure I agree entirely, but I can see that in some cases, if you don&#8217;t present it well, it could come across as making music seem &#8220;cheap&#8221; or unimportant. I&#8217;d argue the answer is to focus on the positives of access, engaging with fans, and making sure there are other offerings available to show that you&#8217;re serious about business (and that the stuff takes money to make!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2009/11/06/free-music-doesnt-mean-devalued-music/comment-page-1/#comment-22520</link>
		<dc:creator>david Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/?p=1025#comment-22520</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful comments on idea of &quot;zero&quot;. Some musicians commented to me (after I posted a link to another blog about zero) that zero price creates less demand than some (even if low) price, indicating that zero value is reflected in consumer perception of value of music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful comments on idea of &#8220;zero&#8221;. Some musicians commented to me (after I posted a link to another blog about zero) that zero price creates less demand than some (even if low) price, indicating that zero value is reflected in consumer perception of value of music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
