<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Unity Behind Diversity &#187; mythtv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blaise.ca/blog/tag/mythtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blaise.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Searching for beauty in the dissonance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ca/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Family Room Computing</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2010/02/01/family-room-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://blaise.ca/blog/2010/02/01/family-room-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[386]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growing up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mythtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[room computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/?p=1419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Credit: exfordy [CC BY] My first computing experience was on the family computer, a 386 running Windows 3.1 in my parents&#8217; den. It was truly a family computer&#8212;my parents used it for work, and the kids used it for games. A few years later, my parents moved to IBM ThinkPads with Windows 95 (vehicles for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/exfordy/405045650/" style="float:right;padding:7px;text-align:center;font-size:xx-small;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/exfordy/405045650/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/149/405045650_d82390a4e2_m.jpg" alt="Old monitor"/></a><br/>Credit: <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL"  href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/exfordy/">exfordy</a> [<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en_CA">CC BY</a>]</div>
<p>My first computing experience was on the family computer, a 386 running Windows 3.1 in my parents&#8217; den. It was truly a family computer&mdash;my parents used it for work, and the kids used it for games. A few years later, my parents moved to IBM ThinkPads with Windows 95 (vehicles for my first Internet experiences, dialing into chat rooms to talk about my dog with strangers&#8230; I was 9!), but the kids&#8217; computer was still the shared desktop. When the 386 was no longer able to run our games, it was replaced with a new Windows 98 desktop. That shared kids&#8217; computer spent most of its life out in the open, in our family room.</p>
<p>In the next five years, our home computing landscape changed drastically. I got my own desktop when I started high school in 2001. A few years later, I acquired a laptop after a summer trip overseas, and my two siblings (3 and 6 years younger) both got recycled older desktops in their rooms for homework. My desktop became the new kids&#8217; computer, but it was quickly phased out as gaming shifted to consoles and my siblings got upgraded machines. By 2005, our computing took place in separate rooms.</p>
<p>But in 2007, I entered the free software world and developed an interest in bringing old neglected Windows machines back to life with GNU/Linux. I bought a TV tuner card, and turned my old Windows 98 desktop into a <a href="http://www.mythtv.org/">MythTV</a> server (among <a href="http://alleyne.to/">other things</a>). It was an odd project, since I <em>rarely</em> watch TV, but soon enough I had another old computer <a href="http://www.mythbuntu.org/">connected</a> to my MythTV server and setup on the big screen TV in our family room</p>
<p>I soon realized that we didn&#8217;t just have a new way of watching TV, but a fully-featured PC hooked up to a giant screen. With a couch and a wireless keyboard, I began using it to browse the web and consume other forms of media (especially useful when we had company!) and even used it for some work (handy for group projects!). It provided a stark contrast to the tethered appliance computers nearby&mdash;an XBOX 360 and a Rogers HD PVR (<a href="http://identi.ca/notice/9103863">which broke!</a>).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want <em>any</em> proprietary tethered appliances when I move out. I want a general purpose computer that <strong><em>opens up to the room</em></strong>&mdash;not a <em>personal</em> computer that family members take turns using, or a TV that people just <em>watch</em>, but a group computer that brings <em>other people</em> into the computing experience.</p>
<p>With a general purpose computer, I can specialize with software (MythTV for television channels, Firefox for web content, etc.). MythTV is cool, but video is moving from TV to the web&mdash;why not focus on that? I don&#8217;t know of a real group user interface for general purpose operating systems yet (i.e. like on video game consoles), but a big display goes a long way to involving a room in the meantime. I&#8217;m also fascinated to think about how handheld devices fit into the picture, with large tablets for media consumption or <a href="http://blaise.ca/blog/2010/01/27/its-not-a-phone-its-a-mobile-computer/">smaller tablets</a> as controllers.</p>
<p>A TV is just a big screen. I&#8217;d rather have a computer I can own, control and create with hooked up to it, instead of the black box proprietary tethered appliances that commonly broadcast into a room. I don&#8217;t want a &#8220;home entertainment system;&#8221; I want a <strong><em>shared computing experience</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Is there a name for this? I&#8217;ve been calling it &#8220;family room computing&#8221;&mdash;or just &#8220;room computing&#8221;&mdash;but suggestions are welcome. I&#8217;m just getting some rough thoughts out. What do you think family room computing could look like, with computer users in charge?</p>
<p>ps that original family room computer? It&#8217;s still semi-set up in our basement&mdash;I installed Debian on it a few years ago to give <a href="http://www.fluxbox.org/">Fluxbox</a> a try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blaise.ca/blog/2010/02/01/family-room-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I use MythTV</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/01/23/why-i-use-mythtv/</link>
		<comments>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/01/23/why-i-use-mythtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mythtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techdirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/01/23/why-i-use-mythtv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Ho from Techdirt provides his take on the &#8220;glorious future&#8221; of video players, sentiments with which I can strongly empathize: With each new offering, it seems like viewers need a separate and proprietary piece of video playing software which is obviously aimed at enhancing the viewing experience for the audience. The DRM and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Ho from Techdirt provides <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080121/05083917.shtml">his take</a> on the &#8220;glorious future&#8221; of video players, sentiments with which I can strongly empathize:</p>
<blockquote><p>With each new offering, it seems like viewers need a separate and proprietary piece of video playing software which is obviously aimed at enhancing the viewing experience for the audience. The DRM and the crazy number of different time limitations for how long you can watch you downloaded shows are really just bonus features. Imagine the glorious future of watching a la carte videos where every distribution channel has its own player and set of rules for how you can consume the content. Future DVRs will incorporate access control systems that would rival the most complex enterprise content management systems of today. I can&#8217;t wait to click through dozens of end-user agreements just to watch my favorite time-shifted shows! Progress is great. </p></blockquote>
<p>I recently helped a family friend install a Rogers HD PVR at their home. It was an educational experience. They had several devices that needed to be hooked into the TV, but once everything was plugged in I thought it would be ready to go. Not so with Rogers&#8230; turning the HD PVR on for the first time displayed only a screen saying: &#8220;Your settop box has not yet be authorized. Please call &lt;phone number/&gt;&#8221;</p>
<p>I will <em>never</em> purchase a device that needs to phone home in order to turn on and work for me.</p>
<p>Rogers has a right to control the use of their network, sure, but to control your own device in your own house? The most obvious problem that comes to mind would be if you ever cancelled your Rogers cable account (say, to switch to another provider). Sure, the box may not work with another provider, that&#8217;s expected, but you wouldn&#8217;t even be able to turn it on to watch TV shows you&#8217;ve already recorded! Never mind trying to get this device to play nice with other devices you own&#8230;</p>
<p>Until a commercial company starts offering something that isn&#8217;t <a href="http://defectivebydesign.org">defective by design</a>, I&#8217;m sticking to <a href="http://www.mythtv.org">MythTV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blaise.ca/blog/2008/01/23/why-i-use-mythtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Media Server &#8211; Introduction</title>
		<link>http://blaise.ca/blog/2007/05/03/home-media-server-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://blaise.ca/blog/2007/05/03/home-media-server-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 07:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mythtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pvr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaise.ca/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently embarked on a project to build my own home media server, a PVR which would be accessible to any computer or television in my house, that not only makes live and recorded television easily accessible, but that also hopefully serves up other content (such as music, photos, games), and hopefully something which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently embarked on a project to build my own home media server, a PVR which would be accessible to any computer or television in my house, that not only makes live and recorded television easily accessible, but that also hopefully serves up other content (such as music, photos, games), and hopefully something which could be accessed remotely (e.g. from my laptop with an internet connection outside the house).</p>
<p>The irony is that I hate television. With a passion.</p>
<p>However, the project has still somehow captured my interest. It&#8217;s a way to put some of my technical knowledge to practical use. Also, part of the project&#8217;s purpose is to come up with a relatively simple and inexpensive setup that a computer hobbyist (ie. not an expert, but an enthusiast) could adopt on their own, something that some of my friends and family may be able to set up by themselves, or with a little bit of assistance. At the very least, it promises to be a learning experience regardless of whether or not I succeed.<br />
<span id="more-9"></span><br />
I&#8217;m going to attempt to document my experience and blog a few tutorial-like recaps of what I have done along the way. Though I don&#8217;t kid myself into thinking that I&#8217;m writing for a wide audience, I am writing for an audience with a wide ranger of skill levels, so I will try to make the tutorials as understandable as I can, yet detailed enough to contain the necessary technical details so that a more experienced computer user can get something out of it as well. Since there will definitely be many steps in the project, I will try and break down my blogging into appropriate segments. Some may be more technically demanding than others (e.g. installing the TV Tuner card + drivers will require more technical knowledge than configuring software settings).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start by defining some goals for the system I will attempt to build:</p>
<ol>
<li>to be inexpensive and affordable;</li>
<li>to be comparable to commercial alternatives;</li>
<li>to be configurable by a hobbyist (ie. complete geekdom should not be a requirement);</li>
<li>to be flexible and free [as in freedom] (ie. offer the user choice);</li>
<li>to be truly cross-platform (ie. compatible with Windows/Mac/Linux/TV );</li>
<li>to be extensible (ie. to work on a single machine, or across several).</li>
</ol>
<p>Many of these goals can be summed up in the phrase &#8220;better than the alternatives.&#8221; The system I am building must have some clear advantages over its commercial alternatives, otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t be worth the effort. These advantages may be in price or in flexibility, but ultimately the setup must still incorporate the types of features one would expect in a commercial offering, at least to a reasonable extent. Goal #4 is also integral to the initiative because one of the major advantages of building something on your own is that you own it yourself. You won&#8217;t lose everything once you stop paying the monthly fee, you won&#8217;t be forbidden by contract/license to tinker with your hardware to try something new and exciting, you won&#8217;t be locked in to a company&#8217;s specific setup or offering, etc&#8230; at least that is the ideal I&#8217;m striving for.</p>
<p>There are many consumer electronics companies now scrambling to effectively commercialize and market this kind of entertainment system, and their solutions might work quite well for many people, however, I&#8217;m interested in investigating the alternatives with the hope that I might end up with something a bit different than what you can just get off the shelf.</p>
<p>More to come soon&#8230; stay tuned! (pun fully intended)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blaise.ca/blog/2007/05/03/home-media-server-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

